Highlights of Ophthalmology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  52 (2024)
Volume  51 (2023)
Volume  50 (2022)
Volume  49 (2021)
Volume  48 (2020)
Volume  47 (2019)
Volume  46 (2018)
Volume  45 (2017)
Volume  44 (2016)
Volume  43 (2015)
Volume  42 (2014)
Volume  41 (2013)
Volume  40 (2012)
Volume  39 (2011)
Volume  38 (2009)
Related articles

VOLUME 44 , ISSUE 4S ( Aug-2016, 2016 ) > List of Articles

SUPPLEMENT

Biomechanically Corrected IOP Measurement

Ahmed Elsheikh, Ashkan Mohammadvali, Kai-Jung Chen

Citation Information : Elsheikh A, Mohammadvali A, Chen K. Biomechanically Corrected IOP Measurement. 2016; 44 (4S):7-8.

DOI: 10.5005/highlights-44-4S-7

Published Online: 29-01-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract
PDF Share
  1. Ambrósio Jr R, Ramos I, Luz A, Faria-Correia F, Steinmueller A, Krug M, Belin MW, Roberts C. Dynamic Ultra- High-Speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties. Rev Bras. Oftalmol 2013, 72(2):99-102.
  2. Roberts CJ. Concepts and Misconceptions in Corneal Biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:862-869.
  3. Metzler K, Mahmoud AM, Liu J, Roberts CJ. Deformation Response of Paired Donor Corneas to An Air Puff: Intact Whole Globe vs Mounted Corneoscleral Rim. J Cataract Refr Surg 2014;40(6):888-96
  4. Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons J, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Ambrósio R. A New Stiffness Parameter in Air Puff Induced Corneal Deformation Analysis. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2016;57: ARVO E-Abstract 2390.
  5. Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, et al. Influence of Pachymetry and Intraocular Pressure on Dynamic Corneal Response parameters Provided by Corvis ST in Healthy Subjects: Normative Values and Suspect Pathology. J Refract Surg 2016;In press.
  6. Joda AA, Shervin MMS, Kook D, Elsheikh A. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2015:1-11.
  7. Lopes BT, Ramos IdC, Salomão MQ, Canedo ALC, Ambrósio Jr. R. Perfil paquimétrico horizontal para a detecção do ceratocone. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2015;74:382-5.
  8. Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, et al. Detection of Keratoconus with a new Corvis ST Biomechanical Index. J Refract Surg 2016;Under review.
  9. Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stulting RD, et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2005;21:749-52.
  10. Ambrosio R, Jr., Randleman JB. Screening for ectasia risk: what are we screening for and how should we screen for it? J Refract Surg 2013;29:230-2.
  11. McGhee CN, Kim BZ, Wilson PJ. Contemporary Treatment Paradigms in Keratoconus. Cornea 2015;34 Suppl 10:S16-23.
  12. Ambrosio R, Jr., Belin MW. Imaging of the cornea: topography vs tomography. J Refract Surg 2010;26:847-9.
  13. Ambrosio R, Jr., Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, et al. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011;51:11-38.
  14. Belin MW, Khachikian SS. An introduction to understanding elevation-based topography: how elevation data are displayed - a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:14-29.
  15. Ramos IC, Correa R, Guerra FP, et al. Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates. J Refract Surg 2013;29:770-5.
  16. Belin MW, Ambrosio R. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:401-6.
  17. Duncan JK, Belin MW, Borgstrom M. Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3:6.
  18. Ambrosio R, Jr., Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1851-9.
  19. Luz A, Ursulio M, Castaneda D, Ambrosio R, Jr. [Corneal thickness progression from the thinnest point to the limbus: study based on a normal and a keratoconus population to create reference values]. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2006;69:579-83.
  20. Ambrosio R, Jr., Caiado AL, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2011;27:753-8.
  21. Orucoglu F, Toker E. Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:925414.
  22. Ambrosio R, Jr., Valbon BF, Faria-Correia F, Ramos I, Luz A. Scheimpflug imaging for laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:310-20.
  23. Lopes BT, Ramos IC, Dawson DG, Belin MW, Ambrosio R, Jr. Detection of ectatic corneal diseases based on pentacam. Z Med Phys 2016.
  24. Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kilic I. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2015.
  25. Klyce SD. Chasing the suspect: keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:845-7.
  26. Saad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5546-55.
  27. Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2231-8.
  28. Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:237-46 e1.
  29. Ruisenor Vazquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, et al. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. American journal of ophthalmology 2014;158:32-40 e2.
  30. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62.
  31. Fontes BM, Ambrosio R, Jr., Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010;117:673-9.
  32. Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, et al. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;164:14-21.
  33. Ambrosio R, Jr., Dawson DG, Salomao M, Guerra FP, Caiado AL, Belin MW. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye. J Refract Surg 2010;26:906-11.
  34. Ambrósio Jr R, Ramos I, Luz A, et al. Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2013;72:99-102.
  35. Lopes BT, Ramos IdC, Salomão MQ, Canedo ALC, Ambrósio Jr. R. Perfil paquimétrico horizontal para a detecção do ceratocone. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2015;74:382-5.
  36. Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2425-33.
  37. Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg 2010;26:259-71.
  38. Abou Shousha M, Perez VL, Fraga Santini Canto AP, et al. The use of Bowman's layer vertical topographic thickness map in the diagnosis of keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2014;121:988-93.
  39. Elsheikh, A., Alhasso, D., Gunvant, P. & Garway-Heath, D. F. Multi-parameter correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometry. Optometry and Vision Science 88(1) (2011).
  40. Joda, A. A., Shervin, M. M., Kook, D. & Elsheikh, A. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 19, 943-953 (2016).
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.