Highlights of Ophthalmology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 41 , ISSUE 4ENG ( Aug-2013, 2013 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

The Role of Tear Substitutes in the Eye Relieve in Chronic Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis

Iqbal H. Mohamed

Citation Information : Mohamed IH. The Role of Tear Substitutes in the Eye Relieve in Chronic Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis. 2013; 41 (4ENG):16-21.

DOI: 10.5005/hoo-10101-41405

Published Online: 25-03-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of tear substitute in patients with chronic seasonal allergic conjunctivitis i.e. spring catarrh and analysis of the outcome results. Design: Prospective randomized study. Patients and method: 240 patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis complicating with dry eye are randomized in 3 groups. Group I received antihistaminic in the form of Epinastine hydrochloride 0.5 mg per mL while group II received tear substitutes in the form of carboxymethylcellulose and glycerin; group III received combination of the two drugs. The outcome measures were the eye comfortability and relieve of eye burning and blurring vision. Results: Complete comfortability in 46.5% of patients and partial comfortability in 33.8% of patients. These percent to 60.6% and 21.3% respectively if antihistaminic were added to tear substitutes. Conclusion: At a time, allergy may fade away but dry eye persists. Patients should continue tear substitutes during the attack. Dry eye disease is the missing already present disease in chronic allergy. This study proved that tear substitutes prescription in chronic allergy not only achieve eye relieve but also improve the quality of vision. Till now, the chronic allergy-dry eye complex is still an unfinished business and further studies are needed to solve the chronic allergy-dry eye puzzle.


PDF Share
  1. Barbee RA, Kaltenborn W, Lebowitz MD, et al. Longitudinal changes in allergen skin test reactivity in a community population sample. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987,79:16-24.
  2. Maziak W, Behrens T, Brasky TM, et al. Are asthma and allergies in children and adolescents increasing. Results from ISAAC phase I and phase III surveys in Munster, Germany. Allergy 2003, 58:572-579.
  3. Verlato G, Corsico A, Villani S, et al. Is the prevalence of adult asthma and allergic rhinitis still increasing. Results of an Italian study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 111:1232-1238.
  4. Leonardi S, del Giudice Miraglia M, et al. Atopic disease, immune system, and the environment. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007, 28(4):410-417.
  5. Friedlander MH: Ocular Allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011, 11(5):477-482.
  6. Bielory L, Frohman L: Allergic and immunologic disorders of the eye. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992, 86:1-20.
  7. Leonardi A, Motterle L, Bortolotti M: Allergy and the eye. Clin Exp Immunol 2008, 153:17-21.
  8. Wong AH, Barg SS, Leung AK: Seasonal and perennial conjunctivitis. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2009, 3:118-127.
  9. Bonini S: Atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy 2004, 59:71-73.
  10. Dell SJ, Shulman DG, Lowry GM, et al. A controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate in the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Loteprednol Allergic Conjunctivitis Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol 1997,123:791-797.
  11. Dell SJ, Lowry GM, Northcutt JA, et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel study of 0.2% loteprednol etabonate in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998, 102:251-255.
  12. Fan DS, Yu CB, Chiu TY, et al. Ocular-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory response to rimexolone therapy in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2003, 121:1716-1721.
  13. Pflugfelder SC, Maskin SL, Anderson B, et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparison of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, and placebo for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with delayed tear clearance. Am J Ophthalmol 2004, 138:444-457.
  14. Brewitt H, Sistani F. Dry eye disease: the scale of the problem. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:199-201.
  15. O'Brien PD, Collum LM. Dry eye: Diagnosis and current treatment strategies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004;4:314-9.
  16. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007) Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75-92.
  17. Shulman DG, Lothringer LL, Rubin JM, et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel study of loteprednol etabonate 0.2% in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 1999;Feb;106(2):362-9
  18. Dell SJ, Lowry GM, Northcutt JA, et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel study of loteprednol etabonate 0.2% in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:251-5.
  19. Gifford P, Evans B, Morris J. 2006. A clinical evaluation of Systane. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 29:31-42.
  20. Ousler G, Michaelson C, Christensen M. 2007. An evaluation of tear fi lm break-up time extension and ocular protection index scores among three marketed lubricant eye drops. Cornea, 26:949-52.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.