Highlights of Ophthalmology

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 45 , ISSUE 6ENG ( Dec-2017, 2017 ) > List of Articles

Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens for Near Vision Correction in Combined Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery

Lyle Newball

Citation Information : Newball L. Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens for Near Vision Correction in Combined Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery. 2017; 45 (6ENG):4-11.

DOI: 10.5005/highlights-45-6-4

Published Online: 09-01-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (9)
  2. Anton A, B€ohringer D, Bach M, Reinhard T, Birnbaum F. Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252:539-544
  3. Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Wells J, Sloane ME, McGwinG Jr. Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119:881-887.
  4. McGwin G Jr, Chapman V, Owsley C. Visual risk factors for driving difficulty among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2000; 32:735-744.
  5. Libro Catarata y Glaucoma de la Secoir 2012; Cap 48:314-325.
  6. Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, et al. Comparison of Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. L Glaucoma 2003;12:134-8
  7. Stamper RL. Psycophysical changes in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;33:309-18
  8. Stifter E, Sacu S, Thaler A, Weghaut S. Contrast acuity in cataract of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47:5412-22
  9. McKendrick AM, Sampson GP, Walland MJ, Badcock DR. Contrast sensitivity changes due to glaucoma and normal aging: low-spatial-frequency losses in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(5):2115-2122.
  10. Aychoua N, Montolio FGJ, Jansonius NM. Influence of multifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry test results. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(4):481-485.
  11. Kumar BV, Phillips RP, Prasad S. Multifocal intraocular lenses in the setting of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:62-68.
  12. Teichman JC, Ahmed IIK. Intraocular lens choices for patients with glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:135-143.
  13. Souza CE, Mucciolli C, Soriano ES, et al. Visual performance of AcrySof apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:827-832.
  14. Vingolo EM, Grenga P, Iacobelli L, Grenga R. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof Restor apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(7):1244- 1247.
  15. Pablo Artal1,*, Silvestre Manzanera1, Patricia Piers2 and Henk Weeber2. Visual effect of the combined correction of spherical and longitudinal chromatic aberrations. Optics Express 1637 18 January 2010/Vol. 18, No. 2.
  16. H. Zhao, M. Mainster. The effect of cromatic dispersión on pseudofakic optical performance. Br J Ophthalmology 2007;91: 1225-1229.
  17. Weber et al. Differences in Chromatic Aberrations of IOLs, ESCRS 2016.
  18. Mathai A, Thomas R, Braganza A, et al. Vistech contrast sensitivity testing in prymary open angle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1997; 45:99-103.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.